On Thursday appealed little brother arrest for the murder of Lisa Holm; 17.
In today appealed also big brother.
– It completely lacking forensic evidence writes lawyer.
The 35-year-old man, who is a Lithuanian national, denies any involvement in the current event, writes his attorney Inger Rönnbäck in the appeal.
Witnesses may have been affected
She argues that the district court hearing, which ended with her client and his younger brother both were arrested on probable cause suspected of murder, not followed properly.
– As for testimonials and medmisstänktas data these are not reported in a way that allows the district court or the defense can assess the strength of the data, writes the lawyer.
– It has emerged that respect, moreover, not by any strength.
She also says that the big media attention that has been around Lisa Holm’s disappearance may have influenced the witnesses heard.
– In addition, the imbalance of information by the public defenders coated with yppandeförbud, but prosecutors and police pronounce themselves journalists.
“Missing entirely technical evidence”
Lawyer Inger Rönnbäck writes in the appeal that it “completely lacking technical evidence ‘.
– Given the large resources devoted to the proceedings ought to any kind of forensic evidence now been mentioned.
Her client, the 35-year-old man, lived near the place where Lisa Holm was found dead. This, says the lawyer, can not be accorded probative value.
– The fact that he lives in the area and therefore knows it can not constitute evidence of significant strength.
She also suggests that her client, and the other detainees, suspected of coming from Lithuania.
– that he and his family are not Swedish may have significance in the case.
Most likely the Gota Court of Appeal has already during Monday afternoon to consider the arrest against the two brothers.
The prosecutor: Do not comment
Deputy Chief Prosecutor Lars-Göran Wennerholm says to Aftonbladet that he was not aware of the appeals, nor called to Court of Appeal.
If there will be a new hearing today, he says, so the prosecution the opportunity to present any new evidence.
But if they received any response from the technical investigation or autopsy, he would not tell.
– We comment nothing of the sort.
No comments:
Post a Comment